Jonathan Charteris-Black sets out to raise critical awareness of the language used by political leaders to convince others. Such rhetoric. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (second edition) Jonathan Charteris-Black Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, , pp. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor JONATHAN CHARTERIS-BLACK is Senior Lecturer in Applied Linguistics at the.
|Published (Last):||8 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||3.32 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Although Charteris-Black does supply a certain amount of general background information about each politician, he does rhetoic do the same for individual speeches: What is known as rater reliability in social science is thus a problem here. Other editions – View all Politicians and Rhetoric: Parliamentary Affairs 67, — Despite periodic laments about the decline of parliamentary oratory, language — and thus rhetoric as the art of verbal persuasion — is clearly as crucial as ever to the business of politics, especially where relations with the media and through them the public are concerned.
Selected pages Title Page. Clinton was rhetoirc successful orator, but in this chapter Charteris-Black misses a few important points.
My library Help Advanced Book Search. According to Charteris-Black, critical metaphor analysis is not restricted to metaphors, but also takes in metonyms If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in.
Palgrave Macmillan,pp. Full text PDF Send by e-mail.
Bush although, for some odd reason, a few speeches by George H. Of the metaphors Blair frequently used, among the most common were journey metaphors. Browse Index Authors Keywords.
Professor Jonathan Charteris-Black – UWE Bristol
Interpreting and Changing the World. For example, he often personified Britain positively and Nazi Germany negatively, imagining Britain as a hero and Nazi Germany as a monster p.
Contents 1 Persuasion Speech Making and Rhetoric. Appendix 11 Clinton Corpus. Rhetoric from Aristotle to Obama.
Jonathan Charteris-Black, Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor
Grounded Theory in Applied Linguistics Research. I have used the approach to examine the communication of a wide range of western and non-western political leaders. Remember me on this computer. Rhetoric, in other words, cannot be reduced to metaphor alone. This analysis of the rhetoric of nine successfully persuasive politicians explains how their use of language created credible and consistent stories about themselves and the social world they inhabit. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor J.
For example, he did so to positively associate good government with creation and to negatively associate terrorism with destruction.
Professor Jonathan Charteris-Black
Account Options Sign in. That is to say, Blair was able to blend formal and informal styles in order to speak clearly and concisely in public. March Invited Speaker, University of Manchester. Charteris-Black Limited preview – The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Appendix 3 Luther King Corpus.
Palgrave MacMillan Basingstoke As Charteris-Black points out, aggressive metaphors of conflict rhrtoric commonly used by Thatcher. Bedrettin Yazan and Nathanael Rudolph eds: My library Help Advanced Book Search. The Edward Snowden affair: This book analyzes chatreris-black rhetoric of speeches by major British or American politicians and shows how metaphor is used systematically to create political myths of monsters, villains and heroes.
Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. Therefore, the same number of similar types of speeches delivered before similar types of audiences should be analyzed in order to get a more balanced yet comprehensive picture of the rhetoric of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers. While Charteris-Black realizes that the moral accounting metaphor exists in many different cultures p.
Such an assumption may be a primary motivation for the use of financial metaphors in the domain of morality p. While fulfilling a purpose can be thought of as traveling toward a destination, moving aimlessly or drifting around with no place to reach is a metaphorical sign of having no purpose.
From the Swamp to the Stars. A vital cause and effect relation, in other words, is simply presupposed. But to study persuasion is another matter. Professor in Linguistics Department: